• Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
EAAS Archive & History
GFF 2017: Realities and World Building

University of Vienna, September 20-23, 2017

Call for papers (by February 28, 2017)

The creation and experience of “new” worlds is a central appeal of the fantastic. From Middle
Earth to variations of the Final Frontier, the fantastic provides a seemingly infinite number of
fantastic “worlds” and world concepts. It develops and varies social and cultural systems,
ideologies, biological and climatic conditions, cosmologies and different time periods. Its
potential and self-conception between the possible and the impossible offer perspectives to
nearly every field of research.

The plurality and concurrent existence of different, even contradictory concepts of reality is an
established topos in cultural and social sciences.1 In a similar fashion, scientific narratives can
simultaneously coexist with fantastic ones within the cultural network of meaning2 – without
creating an existential antagonism between them. The reason for that is not that one of these
narratives is true while the other is not, but – following Hayden White, who assumed that
scientific and literary narratives have more in common than not3 – because both of them are
fictional. If a fantastic narrative is internally consistent, it is in a Wittgensteinian sense4 as true as
Newton’s laws. This poses an existential problem for the fantastic: if it applies to every consistent
narrative, what is the defining difference between fantastic and other narratives?

In our everyday practice, however, we seem to easily distinguish the fantastic from other
aspects of reality. How is that possible? How can fantastic worlds emerge within and besides
other multiple world-conceptions? What are the functions of fantastic worlds in the construction
of reality? In designating texts as fantastic, we explicitly assert their fictitious character. Which
practices do we employ to facilitate this designation?

We call narratives fantastic that violate our common reality consensus, thus establishing their
own counter-reality consensus – in other words, a different world. This is done in different ways,
thereby defining fantastic genres: for example, science fiction uses key motives like objects and
cultural practices (interstellar travels, wormhole-generators, etc.) for world-building that belong to
a realm of conceivable future possibility. While the modern scientific reality consensus does not
categorically preclude beaming, it does deny the very possibility of a demon summoning.

In order to serve as a foil to the real, the fantastic has to play an ambiguous role: key motives
of its multiple worlds have to be recognizable as imaginary, but at the same time at least some of
these elements have to be linked with common reality consensus. A typical strategy for achieving
this ambiguity is the incorporation of cultural practices that remind us of established perceptions
of history, most prominently perhaps the European Middle Ages. Thus, a perceptible distance
between the narrative and the recipient’s common reality consensus gets established, while using
parts of this very consensus to render the narrative comprehensible.

Wolfgang Iser considers the “fictive” to be an intentional act, and the “imaginary” the
recipient’s conception of the fictionalization’s effects.5 World Building is part of every narrative,
but as a result of variable cultural contexts, every narrative is involved in different modes of
production and perception. The conference aims to emphasize and reflect these very acts of
fictionalization used to build fantastic worlds – in different media, and on theoretical as well as
methodological levels.

Accepted Keynotes:
Stefan Ekman (University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
Farah Mendlesohn (University of Stafford, UK)

Possible Topics:
• Intermedia (and media-specific) features and indicators of fantastic worlds in film, TV,
literature, (digital) games, etc.
• How does the extradiegetic constitute fantastic worlds and vice versa? Social and cultural
systems, ideologies, biological and climatic conditions, cosmologies, etc.
• World-building methods and practices: reflections on economic and technical resources;
transparent world-building (Making-ofs, exhibitions, interviews, etc.)
• Construction plans: sourcebooks, world editors, Table-Tops, miniatures, dioramas,
• We are of course open to further suggestions. The conference will also feature an “Open
Track” for presentations beyond the scope of this CFP.

The GFF awards two stipends to students to help finance traveling costs (250 Euro each). Please
indicate if you would like to be considered.

CALL HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO February 28th 2017

Please send short bio & abstracts (500 words max.) to thomas.walach@univie.ac.at


European Journal of American Studies

The European Journal of American Studies is the official journal of EAAS. It welcomes contributions from Americanists in Europe and elsewhere and aims at making available state-of-the-art research on all aspects of United States culture and society.

Read more at http://ejas.revues.org/.

European Views of the United States

European Views of the United States is the official book series of the EAAS.9783825365783       

We are proud to announce volumes 8, 9, 10 of the series:

Tanrisever, Ahu. Fathers, Warriors, and Vigilantes: Post-Heroism and the US Cultural Imaginary in the Twenty-First Century, vol. 10, 2016 (Rob Kroes Publication Award 2015).

Intercontinental Crosscurrents: Women's Networks across Europe and the Americas, eds. Julia Nitz, Sandra H. Petrulionis, and Theresa Schön, vol. 9, 2016.

America: Justice, Conflict, War, eds. Amanda Gilroy and Marietta Messmer, vol. 8, 2016 (The Hague Conference 2014).

Read more ...

picto_facebook picto_twitter